Sunday, September 28, 2014

Poverty in Our Country - Il-Faqar f'Pajjiżna

Poverty In Our Country

My attention was drawn to a report about Malta, entitled Sustainable Governance Indicators, drawn up this year by the consultancy company Bertelsmann Stiftung1. The report discusses economic, social and environmental policies, as well as the democratic system and its governance.

I was particularly struck by the chapter on social policy, especially the statistics on poverty as compared to the European Union average.

In this report, poverty is understood in its traditional sense, that is an income level considered to be low, and does not include other wider aspects such as the lack of inadequacy of education, roof over one's head and the like.

This report quoted the Maltese National Statistics Office (NSO) as saying that today the quantity of Maltese considered at risk of poverty being at 63,000, or 21.4% of the population. There has been a bit of controversy in Malta about this percentage figure which when compared to the Maltese population is too high - perhaps a mathematical error.

So I decided to have a look myself at the NSO statistics2. This says that at the end of 2013, there were 64,996 people out of a population of 412,534 (15.7%) considered at risk of poverty, when this is taken as an income less than 60% of the median equivalised income (which takes the total household income, subtracts taxes and distributes the rest to the members of the household, with children given a reduced weighting).

This figure unfortunately was an increase from the level of 15.1% as at the end of 2012. In the EU, the equivalent figure of people at risk of poverty was 24.8%3, substantially higher.

If the threshold of poverty is taken as 50% of the median equivalised income, then the percentage of people considered at risk of poverty was 8.9% (36,534) in 2013, still more than 7.4% (30,456) in 2012.

The Bertelsmann Stiftung report says that the Maltese Government intends to achieve a target of 6,560 people considered at risk of poverty by 2020. Actually, the Maltese Government had committed to the EU that by the year 2020 it would decrease the quantity by 6,560, not to 6,560.

I also looked up the situation in Australia. The OECD issues statistics for its member countries4, and one can find that in 2012 over here there were 13.8% of people considered at risk of poverty (income less than 50% of median equivalised income). In Australia there is the effect of the Aboriginal population, who face substantial social problems, not having yet overcome the decades of exclusion and discrimination by a predominantly Anglo-Saxon society.

Naturally, one must bear in mind that levels of income in one country compared to another may be different. For example, a person considered poor in Australia, or in Europe, may have an income with which he/she might not be considered poor in Malta.

There are many other details in these reports, including analysis of poverty by sex, age etc. It's not my intention to treat these details here, except to make one observation.

10% of the population is one out of every 10 persons, 15% is one out of every 6. Would you consider these figures high or low?

Keep in mind that in the street you live in, there could be that proportion of your neighbours at risk of poverty. Perhaps its that man you nod to on your way to work, or that woman you recognise on the other side of the road while making your daily shopping.

Here in Australia, there was a bit of an uproar when the new Liberal-National Coalition government issued its budget for this year. That it intended to tighten the belt, to use a common expression of the ex-Maltese Prime Minister Dom Mintoff, was probably a surprise to no one.

However to propose such harsh measures to the most vulnerable people in society, while people not so poor being hit relatively much less, I was never expecting. The rhetoric coming from government ministers, about society split between lifters and leaners5, or that poor people don't have cars or don't drive very far6, shows an ideological poverty and lack of empathy with who is doing it tough.

Some time ago, I happened to watch the discussion programme Q&A on the ABC7, which included the participation of a person of Maltese descent, Dr John Falzon, who is the CEO of the organisation St Vincent De Paule. His message was similar to what he wrote in a 2012 report on poverty in Australia, and I'd like to close by quoting a part thereof:

Our problem in Australia is not the “idleness of the poor.” Our problem is inequality. This is a social question, not a question of behaviour. We do irreparable harm when we turn it into a question of individual behaviour, blaming people for their own poverty.8


1 Sustainable Governance Indicators - 2014 Malta Report; Pirotta, Calleja & Colino; Bertelsmann Stiftung
2Statistics on Income and Living Conditions 2013: Salient Indicators; 164/2014 National Statistics Office Malta, 3/9/2014
7http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/txt/s4047130.htm
8Poverty in Australia 2012, 3rd Edition; Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS); p8

-----------------------------------

 
Il-Faqar f'Pajjiżna

Għajnejja nġibdu lejn rapport fuq Malta, imsejjaħ Indikaturi ta' Iggvernar Sostenibbli, miġbur din is-sena mill-kumpannija ta' konsulenza Bertelsmann Stiftung1. Dan ir-rapport jitkellem fuq il-polititika ekonomika, soċjali w ambjentali, kif ukoll fuq is-sistema demokratika u kif il-pajjiż jiġi ggvernat.

Li laqatni partikolarment kien il-kapitlu fuq il-politika soċjali, speċjalment l-istatistika fuq il-faqar, kif imqabbel mal-medja tal-Unjoni Ewropea.

F'dan ir-rapport, il-faqar huwa mifhum fis-sens tradizzjonali tiegħu, jiġifieri l-livell meqjus baxx ta' dħul, u ma jinkludix aspetti oħra iktar wesgħin bħan-nuqqas jew inadekwatezza ta' edukazzjoni, saqaf fuq rasek u l-bqija.

Dan ir-rapport ikkwota lill-Uffiċju Nazzjonali tal-Istatistika (NSO) f'Malta li jgħid li illum l-ammont ta' Maltin meqjusin f'riskju ta' faqar huwa 63,000, jew 21.4% tal-popolazzjoni. Kien hemm daqsxejn ta' kontroversja f'Malta għax dak il-persentaġġ meta mqabbel mal-popolazzjoni f'Malta huwa għoli wisq - forsi żball fil-matematika.

Għalhekk iddeċidejt li nħares lejn l-istatistika tal-NSO direttament2. Dan jgħid li fl-aħħar tal-2013, kien hemm 64,966 persuna minn popolazzjoni ta' 412,534 (15.7%), meqjusin f'riskju tal-faqar, meta dan jittieħed bħala dħul ta' inqas minn 60% tad-dħul medju ekwivalizzat (li jieħu id-dħul totali ta' dar, inaqqas it-taxxi u jqassam il-bqija fuq il-membri tal-familja li jgħixu ġod-dar, bit-tfal ikollhom inqas piż).

Din il-figura sfortunatament kienet żieda mill-livell ta' 15.1% fl-aħħar tal-2012. Fl-Unjoni Ewropea, din il-figura ta' nies f'riskju tal-faqar kienet ta' 24.8% fl-20123, pjuttost iktar għolja.

Jekk il-livell tal-faqar jittieħed li huwa 50% tad-dħul medju ekwivalizzat, il-persentaġġ ta' nies meqjusin f'riskju ta' faqar kien 8.9% (36,534) fl-2013, xorta iktar mill-7.4% (30,456) tal-2012.

Ir-rapport ta' Bertelsmann Stiftung jgħid li l-Gvern Malti għandu l-intenzjoni li jnaqqas l-ammont ta' nies meqjusin f'riskju ta' faqar għal 6,560 sas-sena 2020. Proprjament, il-Gvern Malti kien ikkommetta mal-UE li sas-sena 2020 inaqqas in-numru b'6,560, mhux li jnaqqas in-numru għal 6,560.

Fittixt ukoll is-sitwazzjoni fl-Awstralja. L-OECD toħroġ din l-istatistika għall-pajjiżi membri tagħha4, u wieħed isib li fl-2012 hawnhekk kien hawn 13.8% tal-popolazzjoni meqjusin f'riskju ta' faqar (dħul inqas minn 50% tad-dħul medju ekwivalizzat). Fl-Awstralja hawn l-effett tal-popolazzjoni Aboriġina, li jbatu problemi soċjali sostanzjali, li għadhom m'għelbux il-ħafna għexieren ta' snin ta' esklużjoni u diskriminazzjoni mis-soċjeta' predominantement Anglo-Sassona.

Naturalment, wieħed irid iżomm f'moħħu li l-livell ta' dħul f'pajjiż imqabbel ma' ieħor aktarx ikun differenti. Ngħidu aħna, persuna meqjusa fqira fl-Awstralja, jew l-Ewropa, jista' jkollha dħul li bih ma titqiesx fqira f'Malta.

Hemm ħafna iktar dettalji f'dawn ir-rapporti, inkluż analiżi tal-faqar skont is-sess, jew skont l-età eċċ. M'iniex beħsiebni nidħol f'dawn id-dettalji hawnhekk, ħlief biex niġbed osservazzjoni waħda.

10% tal-popolazzjoni huwa wieħed minn kull 10 persuni, u 15% huwa wieħed minn kull 6. Dawn figuri għoljin jew żgħar?

Żomm f'rasek li fit-triq ta' fejn toqgħod, jista jkun hemm dak il-proporzjon tal-ġirien tiegħek li huma f'riskju ta' faqar. Forsi huwa dak li ssellem int u sejjer għax-xogħol filgħodu, jew dik li tagħraf in-naħa l-oħra tat-triq meta qed tixtri l-bżonnijiet ta' kuljum.

Hawnhekk fl-Awstralja, qamet daqsxejn ta' għagħa meta l-gvern il-ġdid ta' Koalizzjoni Liberali-Nazzjonali ħareġ il-baġit għal din is-sena. Li kien se jissikka ċ-ċintorin, biex nuża espressjoni komuni tal-ex Prim Ministru Malti Dom Mintoff, naħseb li kulħadd kien qed jistennih.

Imma li kien se jipproponi miżuri daqshekk ħorox fuq in-nies l-iktar vulnerabbli tas-soċjetà, filwaqt li l-persuni mhux fqar jintlaqtu relattivament bilwisq inqas, ma kontx qed nistenniha żgur. Ir-retorika li ħarget mill-fomm il-ministri tal-gvern, bħas-soċjeta' maqsuma bejn min jerfa' u min iserraħ5, jew li l-fqar m'għandhomx karrozzi jew ma jsuqux 'il bogħod6, turi faqar ideoloġiku u nuqqas ta' empatija ma' min qiegħed f'sitwazzjoni mwiegħra.

Ftit ilu, inzertajt nara fuq il-programm ta' diskussjoni Q&A fuq l-ABC7 lil persuna ta' nisel Malti, Dr John Falzon, li huwa CEO tal-organizzazzjoni St Vincent De Paule. Il-messaġġ tiegħu kien simili għal dak li kiteb f'rapport tal-2012 fuq il-faqar fl-Awstralja, u xtaqt nagħlaq billi nikkwota parti minnu:

Il-problema fl-Awstralja mhix l-għażż tal-fqar. Il-problema hija l-inugwaljanza. Din hija kwistjoni soċjali, mhux ta' imġiba. Nagħmlu ħsara rreparabbli meta nibdluha f'kwistjoni ta' imġiba individwali, u nwaħħlu fin-nies għall-faqar tagħhom”8.


1 Sustainable Governance Indicators - 2014 Malta Report; Pirotta, Calleja & Colino; Bertelsmann Stiftung
2Statistics on Income and Living Conditions 2013: Salient Indicators; 164/2014 National Statistics Office Malta, 3/9/2014
7http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/txt/s4047130.htm
8Poverty in Australia 2012, 3rd Edition; Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS); p8

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

The Next War? -- Il-Gwerra Li Jmiss?


The Next War?

Little by little, we're moving close to another war, yet again in the Middle East. This story involves the Islamic State (IS), which occupies land that not so long ago was part of Syria and Iraq, and (so far) the usual Western countries, as well as Australia.

We've already talked about IS and the Caliphate in issue 79 of The Voice. Since then, beheadings, threats against specific countries like the US, the UK and even Russia1, forced conversions, beatings, rapes and amputations2 have not stopped.

IS has a Salafist bent. This is a movement that believes authentic Islam is the one based on the teachings of the first generations (salaf) after the Prophet Mohammed, and count as infidel (without faith) or apostate (left the faith) those who hold different interpretations.

IS also believes in holy war (Jihad), prioritising the purification of Muslim society over the fight against non-Muslim countries. This is why it is fighting in Syria against the Syrian government which is Alawite (an offshoot of the Shiites) and also against other groups that are themselves fighting the Syrian government, and in Iraq is fighting against a predominantly Shiite government and the Kurdish parts of northern Iraq.

The philosophy of IS does not permit peaceful coexistence between people and nations of different cultures or beliefs. You either accept to convert and live according to Islamic law (Sharia), or dig your own grave. There are no compromises.

There is no discussion about injustices that exist in the world, about the unfair distribution of natural resources that favour rich countries and multinational companies, about the unjust occupation of Palestinian land by Israel etc.

In fact, I cannot see that there can be a discussion. For much of the world's population that does not hold the same views of IS, if one maintains his own belief, a discussion with someone from IS is expected to quickly become one of life or death, tomorrow if not today.

There is turmoil in the Muslim world, as there are many Muslim authorities who completely disagree with IS, like the Mufti of Egypt who has stated that these extremists are misinterpreting Islam3, or the Council of Australian Imams who have said that extremists are using Islam as a cover for criminal acts and atrocities4.

At the moment, there is an expectation that President Obama of the United States try to lead an adequate reaction to IS. We can already see several actions from the air force in Iraq. NATO countries have also indicated that they are ready to participate in military actions5, and Australia has already made clear that it's ready to provide its support6. Even Pope Francis has indicated that there needs to be some action7.

I declare that I do love peace, but I'm not a pacifist. Pacifism is the opposition to all wars and violence, 'peace' no matter what. My view is that there cannot be peace without justice, and there cannot be peace when one person threatens another's very existence.

Nevertheless I fear an inexorable rush towards a war. Australia has already decided that it's ready to provide war planes if asked8. I acknowledge the government needs to be able to take these decisions quickly if necessary, however the decision by the Coalition government, agreed to by the Labour Party, not to have a discussion in parliament, is arrogant to the extreme. People are sick and tired of being involved in wars away from how, that have to be paid for with enormous amounts of money and with the lives of their children. I think it's very reasonable for the government to hear the thoughts of the people through their representatives in parliament, on a matter which will probably have such a long-term impact on them. Why should such a decision be taken without the people being involved, and simply be informed?

Apart from this, I can see a bigger problem. The nations that so far have been eager for military action are Western. I see a risk of getting involved in a conflict that can be portrayed by IS as between Muslims and Christians, as this without a doubt will attract other Muslims, even those considered moderate, to go to defend Islam. There needs to be a very wide representation, globally, for this fight against extremism. Furthermore, can the solution be only military?

It's not enough that the countries joining in be predominantly Shiite, like Iraq (which is already taking part), as this would also fall into the narrative of a fight between Sunni and Shiite Muslims. There need to be Sunni countries, as well as those of other cultures and beliefs from around the world.

This is not, and should not be able to be portrayed as, a war between Christianity against Islam. It needs to be clear that this is a fight between humanity and inhumanity.


1http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/09/06/islamic-state-militants-want-to-fight-putin-2/, retrieved 8/9/2014
2http://rt.com/news/183172-syria-isis-crimes-humanity/, retrieved 8/9/2014
3http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2014/08/24/Islamic-authority-Extremists-no-Islamic-State-.html, retrieved 8/9/2014
4http://www.anic.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ANIC-CONDEMNS-THE-ACTIONS-PORTRAYED-IN-THE-PHOTO-OF-A-7-YEAR-OLD.pdf, retrieved 8/9/2014
5http://news.yahoo.com/obama-says-key-allies-ready-join-u-action-184811257.html, retrieved 8/9/2014
6http://news.yahoo.com/obama-says-key-allies-ready-join-u-action-184811257.html, retrieved 8/9/2014
7http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/08/13/pope-francis-signals-support-for-iraq-military-action-to-protect-christians-from-brutal-islamic-jihadists/, retrieved 8/9/2014
8http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/03/australia-considering-general-request-military-action-iraq, retrieved 8/9/2014


-------------------------------------------------------

Il-Gwerra Li Jmiss?

Ftit ftit, qegħdin nersqu lejn gwerra oħra, u mill-ġdid fil-Lvant Nofsani. Involuti f'din l-istorja huwa Stat Islamiku (SI), li jokkupa art li sa ftit ilu kienet tagħmel parti mis-Sirja u mill-Iraq, u (s'issa) l-pajjiżi tas-soltu tal-Punent, kif ukoll l-Awstralja.

Fuq SI u l-Kalifat diġà tkellimna fil-ħarġa numru 79 ta' The Voice. Minn dakinhar, il-qtugħ tal-irjus, it-theddid kontra pajjiżi speċifiċi bħall-Istati Uniti, ir-Renju Unit u anke r-Russja1, konverżjonijiet sfurzati, swat, stupru w amputazzjonijiet2, ma waqfux.

L-SI għandu twemmin Salafi. Dan huwa moviment li jemmen li l-Islam awtentiku huwa dak ibbażat fuq it-tagħlim tal-ewwel ġenerazzjonijiet (is-salaf) ta' wara Mawmettu, u jqisu li min iżomm interpretazzjonijiet differenti bħala bla fidi (infidel) jew apostata (wieħed li ċaħad il-fidi).

L-SI temmen ukoll li fil-ġlieda qaddisa (il-Ġiħad), anke qabel ma tiġġieled kontra pajjiżi mhux Musulmani, trid tippurifika lis-soċjetà Musulmana nnifisha. Għalhekk bħalissa qed jiġġieled fis-Sirja kontra l-gvern Sirjan li huwa Alawit (grupp li ħareġ mix-Xiti) u anke kontra l-gruppi l-oħra li qed jiġġieldu lill-gvern Sirjan, u fl-Iraq jiġġieled kontra l-Gvern predominantement Xita u l-partijiet Kurdi tat-tramuntana tal-Iraq.

Il-filosofija ta' SI ma tippermettix għixien fil-paċi jew ko-eżistenza bejn nies u popli ta' twemmin u kulturi differenti. Jew taċċetta li tikkonverti u tgħix skont il-liġi Islamika (ix-Xarija), jew tista' tmur tindifen. Mhemmx kompromessi.

Id-diskors mhux dwar inġustizzji li jeżistu fid-dinja, fuq it-tqassim tar-riżorsi naturali li jiffavorixxu l-pajjiżi għonja jew il-kumpanniji multinazzjonali, fuq l-okkupazzjoni inġusta tal-art Palestinjana mill-Iżrael eċċ.

Fil-fatt, jien lanqas nara li tista' issir diskussjoni. Għall-biċċa l-kbira tal-popolazzjoni dinjija li ma jħaddnux it-twemmin ta' SI, jekk wieħed huwa sod fit-twemmin tiegħu, diskursata ma' xi ħadd minn SI nistenna li malajr issur ta' ħajja jew mewt, jekk mhux illum, għada.

Fid-dinja Musulmana, hemm taqliba sħiħa, għax hemm ħafna awtoritajiet Musulmani li ma jaqblu xejn ma' SI, bħall-Mufti tal-Eġittu li qal li dawn l-estremisti mhux qed jinterpretaw tajjeb l-Islam3, jew il-Kunsill tal-Imami tal-Awstralja li qalu li l-estremisti qed jużaw l-Islam biex jgħattu aġir kriminali u atroċitajiet4.

Bħalissa hemm stennija li l-President Obama tal-Istati Uniti jfittex li pajjiżu jmexxi reazzjoni adekwata għal SI. Diġà qed naraw diversi azzjonijiet mill-forza tal-ajru fl-Iraq. Il-pajjiżi tan-NATO wkoll indikaw li lesti jipparteċipaw f'azzjonijiet militari5, u l-Awstralja għamlitha ċara li lesta tagħti l-appoġġ tagħha6. Anke l-Papa Franġisk indika hemm bżonn li tittieħed azzjoni7.

Jien nistqarr li nħobb il-paċi, imma miniex paċifist. Il-paċifiżmu huwa l-oppożizzjoni għal kull gwerra u l-vjolenza, 'paċi' akkost ta' kollox. Jien nara li ma jistax ikun hemm paċi mingħajr ġustizzja, u ma jistax ikun hemm paċi meta bniedem jhedded l-eżistenza ta' ieħor.

Madankollu wisq nibża meta nara ġirja ineżorabbli lejn gwerra. L-Awstralja diġà ddeċidiet li lesta tipprovdi ajruplani tal-gwerra jekk mitluba8. Nirrikonoxxi li l-gvern għandu jkun jista' jieħu dawn id-deċiżjonijiet malajr jekk hemm bżonn, imma d-deċiżjoni tal-Gvern ta' Koalizzjoni, li qabel magħha l-Partit Laburista, li ma ssirx diskussjoni fil-parlament9, hija arroganti għall-aħħar. In-nies xebgħu jkunu nvoluti f'gwerer barra minn darhom, li jridu jħallsu għalihom b'somom enormi ta' flus u b'ħajjet uliedhom. Naħseb li huwa raġonevoli ħafna li l-gvern jisma l-ħsieb tal-poplu mir-rappreżentanti tiegħu fil-parlament, fuq ħaġa li aktarx ikollha daqshekk impatt fit-tul fuqu. Għalfejn għandha deċiżjoni bħal din tittieħed mingħajr mal-poplu jkun involut, u sempliċement jiġi infurmat?

Apparti hekk, nara problema ikbar. Il-pajjiżi li s'issa l-iktar li urew ħerqa għal azzjoni militari huma l-pajjiżi tal-Punent. Jien nara riskju kbir li nidħlu f'kunflitt li jiġi interpretat minn SI li huwa bejn il-Musulmani u l-Insara, għax dan bla dubju jħajjar lill-Musulmani oħra, anke jekk illum moderati, li jmorru jiddefendu lill-Islam. Irid ikun hemm rappreżentazzjoni wiesgħa ħafna, globali, għal din il-ġlieda kontra l-estremiżmu. Ukoll, is-soluzzjoni militari biss?

Lanqas mhu biżżejjed li jissieħbu pajjiżi predominantement Xiti bħall-Iraq (li diġa qed jieħu sehem), għax din ukoll taqa f'narrativa ta' ġlieda ta' Musulmani Sunni kontra dawk Xiti. Irid ikun hemm pajjiżi Sunni, u oħrajn ta' kultura u twemmin ieħor minn madwar id-dinja.

Din mhix, u lanqas ma trid tiġi mpinġija bħala, gwerra tal-Kristjaneżmu kontra l-Islam. Trid tkun ċara li din hija ġlieda tal-umanità kontra l-inumanità.


1http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/09/06/islamic-state-militants-want-to-fight-putin-2/, retrieved 8/9/2014
2http://rt.com/news/183172-syria-isis-crimes-humanity/, retrieved 8/9/2014
3http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2014/08/24/Islamic-authority-Extremists-no-Islamic-State-.html, retrieved 8/9/2014
4http://www.anic.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ANIC-CONDEMNS-THE-ACTIONS-PORTRAYED-IN-THE-PHOTO-OF-A-7-YEAR-OLD.pdf, retrieved 8/9/2014
5http://news.yahoo.com/obama-says-key-allies-ready-join-u-action-184811257.html, retrieved 8/9/2014
6http://news.yahoo.com/obama-says-key-allies-ready-join-u-action-184811257.html, retrieved 8/9/2014
7http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/08/13/pope-francis-signals-support-for-iraq-military-action-to-protect-christians-from-brutal-islamic-jihadists/, retrieved 8/9/2014
8http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/03/australia-considering-general-request-military-action-iraq, retrieved 8/9/2014
9http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/01/greens-fail-to-force-debate-on-australian-military-involvement-in-iraq, retrieved 8/9/2014