Monday, July 7, 2014

Religion and State - Ir-Reliġjon u l-Istat


Religion and State

Most of you will be aware of a recent significant development in the Middle East. The Sunni organisation Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) has just proclaimed a caliphate in territory captured in Shia-leaning Syria and Iraq. Moreso, it has proclaimed the chief of the organisation, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, as the new caliph, the leader for Muslims everywhere.1

A caliph is the religious and political leader for an Islamic state (caliphate). He or she governs guided by Sharia (law based on principles in the Quran and the example set by the prophet Mohammed), and the Constitution of Medina (a peace agreement signed in Medina, part of modern Saudi Arabia, between the prophet Mohammed and other groups (including Christians), establishing a single nation - the Ummah, with rights and obligations of all communities spelt out).

Malta has had two main brushes with a caliphate in its history. The first came when the islands were ruled from 870AD by the Aghlabids during the Abbasid caliphate period, and later by the Fatimid caliphate, with Arab rule lasting until the Norman invasion in 1091. Then during the time of the Knights of St John came a number of attacks by naval commanders including Dragut from the Turkish Ottoman caliphates, culminating in the Great Siege of Malta in 1565, which to Malta's pride and Christian Europe's relief resulted in a comprehensive victory to the locals.

The main point of the caliphate, is that the temporal rule of the state is based on principles established by Islam. This approach to the fabric of the state is not unique to Islam. In Europe, the Church was the state in much of what is today Italy, even up to very recently. Indeed, the Maltese constitution still states that Roman Catholicism is the religion of the state, that its religious authorities have the right to teach about which principles are right and wrong, and that Roman Catholic religious teaching at school is compulsory2.

It is however clear even in Malta that principles of secular liberalism are becoming widely accepted by the populace. For example, it would have been unthinkable at the time the Maltese constitution was drafted that Malta would eventually legislate to allow divorce and renegotiate the precedence of the Church courts over civil courts on marriage matters3.

The constitution of Australia goes further, preventing the Commonwealth from passing a law establishing a religion, or imposing religious observance, prohibiting the free exercise of any religion or requiring a religious test as a qualification for a Commonwealth office4.

Turkey was the country that had abolished the last caliphate, that of the Ottomans, in 1924, and since then has been a secular state. However as a general rule, countries with Islam as the main practiced religion have a higher proportion than in the West of citizens that call for political rule to be based on the (Islamic) religion. The Arab Spring has seen a tension between those who crave for more and those who crave for less religion entrenched in the state. This may be seen very clearly in places such as Egypt.

In the post-Christian Western tradition I come from, I think it may be said that people have realised that while it is fine to be inspired by the principles of their erstwhile religion when constructing the fabric of the state, it is wise to separate the religious institution from the state to retain social harmony. Common ground can be more easily found in universally acceptable, secular, values and declarations such as the UN Universal Declaration on Human Rights, adopted in 19485. It remains to be seen whether other nations coming from a Muslim tradition will eventually come to the same conclusion.


1http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2014/s4035818.htm, retrieved 1/7/2014
2Constitution of Malta, Article 2
3http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20140222/local/Church-State-separation-is-unquestionable-.507768, retrieved 1/7/2014
4Constitution of Australia, Chapter 5, Section 115
5http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml, retrieved 1/7/2014.


---------------------------------------------------------
 
Ir-Reliġjon u l-Istat

Ħafna minnkom aktarx jafu bi żvilupp sinjifikanti fil-Lvant Nofsani. L-organizzazzjoni Sunni msejħa l-Istat Islamiku tal-Iraq u l-Lvant (ISIS) għadu kif iddikjara kalifat f'territorju maqbud fis-Sirja u l-Iraq li jxaqilbu lejn ix-Xiti. Iktar minn hekk, ipproklamat ukoll il-mexxej tal-organizzazzjoni, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, bħala l-kalif, il-mexxej għall-Musulmani kullimkien1.

Kalif huwa mexxej reliġjuż u politiku għal stat Iżlamiku (kalifat). Hu/hi jiggverna/tiggverna immexxi/ja mix-Xarija (liġi bbażata fuq il-prinċipji tal-Koran u l-eżempju tal-profeta Muħammed) u l-Kostituzzjoni ta' Medina (ftehim ta' paċi iffirmat fil-Medina, parti mis-Sawdi Arabja tal-lum, bejn il-profeta Muħammed u gruppi oħra (bħall-Insara), li stabbiliet nazzjon wieħed - l-Ummaħ, bid-drittijiet u d-dmirijiet tal-komunitajiet kollha mniżżlin).

Malta messet ma' kalifat darbtejn fl-istorja tagħha. L-ewwel darba kien meta l-gżejjer kienu mmexxija mis-sena 870 w.K. mill-Aglabidi fil-perjodu tal-kalifat Abbasid, u wara mill-kalifat Fatimid, bil-ħakma Għarbija tintemm mal-invażjoni Normanna tal-1091 w.K. Imbagħad fi żmien il-Kavallieri ta' San Ġwann kien hemm numru ta' attakki minn kmandanti navali inkluż Dragut mill-kalifat Ottoman tat-Torok, li laħqu l-quċċata tagħhom fl-Assedju l-Kbir ta' Malta tal-1565 w.K., li l-Maltin kburin li wassal għal rebħa sħiha għalihom u serħan il-moħħ għall-Ewropa Nisranija.

Il-punt prinċipali tal-kalifat hu li it-tmexxija sekulari tal-istat huwa bbażat fuq prinċipji stabbiliti tal-Islam. Dan il-mudell ta' tmexxija mhux uniku għall-Islam. Fl-Ewropa, il-Knisja kienet l-istat f'parti kbira ta' dak li llum hija l-Italja, anke sa mhux ħafna ilu. Tassew, il-kostituzzjoni Malti anke llum tgħid li il-Kattoliċiżmu Ruman huwa r-reliġjon tal-istat, li l-awtoritajiet reliġjużi għandhom id-dritt li jgħallmu liemu prinċipji huma tajba u ħżiena, u li tagħlim reliġjuż Kattoliku Ruman irid isir fl-iskejjel2.

Madankollu huwa ċar anke f'Malta li l-prinċipji sekulari liberali qed jiġu aċċettati mill-poplu. Per eżempju, ħadd ma kien jobsor meta l-kostituzzjoni Maltija kienet qed tinkiteb li Malta eventwalment kienet tgħaddi liġi li tippermetti d-divorzju u tirrinegozja l-preċedenza tal-qrati tal-Knisja fuq dawk tal-istat fuq kwistjonijiet ta' żwieġ3.

Il-kostituzzjoni tal-Awstralja tmur iktar minn hekk, ma tħallix lill-Commonwealth li tgħaddi liġi li tistabbilixxi xi reliġjon, li timponi li reliġjon, li ma tħallix li ssegwi xi reliġjon jew li jkun hemm xi test reliġjuz bħala kwalifika għal impjieg tal-Commonwealth4.

It-Turkija kien il-pajjiż li abolixxa l-aħħar kalifat, dak tal-Ottomani, fl-1924, u minn dakinhar kien stat sekulari. Però bħala regola ġenerali, pajjiżi predomantament Islamiċi għandhom proporzjoni iktar għoli minn pajjiżi tal-Punent ta' ċittadini li jridu tmexxija politika li tkun ibbażata fuq ir-reliġjon (Islamika). Ir-Rebbiegħa Għarbija kixfet tensjoni bejn dawk li jridu iktar u dawk li jridu inqas reliġjon imdaħħal fl-istat. Dan jidher ċar f'postijiet bħall-Eġittu.

Fit-tradizzjoni post-Kristjana tal-Punent li jien niġi minnu, naħseb li jista' jingħad li n-nies t'hemm fehmu li għalkemm huwa tajjeb li tkun ispirat mill-prinċipji tar-reliġjon li kellhom meta tibni l-qafas tal-istat, ikun għaqli li tifred l-istituzzjoni reliġjuża mill-istat sabiex tinżamm l-armonija soċjali. Huwa iktar faċli li ssib qbil universali f'valuri u dikjarazzjonijiet sekulari bħal dawk tad-Dikjarazzjoni Universali fuq id-Drittijiet tal-Bniedem tan-Nazzjonijiet Uniti, li ġiet adottata fl-19485. Wieħed irid jara jekk pajjiżi oħra li jiġu minn tradizzjoni Musulmana eventwalment jaslux għall-istess konklużjoni.


1http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2014/s4035818.htm, retrieved 1/7/2014
2Constitution of Malta, Article 2
3http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20140222/local/Church-State-separation-is-unquestionable-.507768, retrieved 1/7/2014
4Constitution of Australia, Chapter 5, Section 115
5http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml, retrieved 1/7/2014.

No comments:

Post a Comment